President Donald Trump targeted federal hiring, including specific rules for the Internal Revenue Service, and the United States’ participation in the global tax framework being developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development among his flurry of executive orders signed on the first day of his second term in the Oval Office.
President Donald Trump targeted federal hiring, including specific rules for the Internal Revenue Service, and the United States’ participation in the global tax framework being developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development among his flurry of executive orders signed on the first day of his second term in the Oval Office.
In one order, President Trump ordered "a freeze on the hiring of Federal civilian employees, to be applied throughout the executive branch. As part of this freeze, no Federal civilian position that is vacant at noon on January 20, 2025, may be filled, and no new position may be created except as otherwise proved for in this memorandum or other applicable law."
The order calls on the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Government Efficiency to "submit a plan to reduce the size of the Federal Government’s workforce through efficiency improvements and attrition."
When that plan is created, the executive order will expire, with the exception of hiring for the Internal Revenue Service.
"This memorandum shall remain in effect for the IRS until the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Director of OMB and the Administrator of [DOGE], determine that it is in the national interest to lift the freeze," the order continues.
The order also prohibits the hiring of contractors to circumvent the order.
In a separate executive order, President Trump has effectively removed the United States from the OECD global corporate tax framework, stating that it "has no force or effect in the United States."
The order goes on to state that "any commitments made by the prior administration on behalf of the United States with respect to the Global Tax Deal have no force or effect within the United States absent any act by the Congress adopting the relevant provisions of the Global Tax Deal."
The framework calls for a 15 percent minimum corporate income tax and has provisions that allow countries to collect a "top-up tax" from companies in countries with a lower rate, something the memo called "retaliatory."
By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is keeping beneficial reporting information reporting voluntary even though the Supreme Court has lifted the injunction that was put in place by a lower court to keep the BOI regulation from being enforced.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is keeping beneficial reporting information reporting voluntary even though the Supreme Court has lifted the injunction that was put in place by a lower court to keep the BOI regulation from being enforced.
"In light of a recent federal court order, reporting companies are not currently required to file beneficial ownership information with FinCEN and are not subject to liability if they fail to do so while the order remains in force," the agency posted to its website on January 24, 2025. "However, reporting companies may continue to voluntarily submit beneficial ownership information reports."
The posting follows a Supreme Court order stating on January 23, 2025, that the injunction put in place by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on December 5, 2024, was removed.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson offered a dissenting opinion on lifting the injunction.
"However likely the Government’s success on the merits may be, in my view, emergency relief is not appropriate because the applicant has failed to demonstrate sufficient exigency to justify our interventions," Justice Jackson wrote, citing two reasons: the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has already expedited the hearing of the case and the government has deferred the implementation of the regulations on its own accord.
"The Government has provided no indication that injury of a more serious or significant nature would result if the Act’s implementation is further delayed while the litigation proceeds in the lower courts. I would therefore deny the application and permit the appellate process to run its course," Justice Jackson added.
By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor
The Treasury and IRS have issued final regulations that provide rules for classifying digital and cloud transactions. The rules apply for purposes of the international provisions of the Code.
The rules retain the overall approach of the proposed regulations (NPRM REG-130700-14, August 14, 2019), with some revisions.
The Treasury and IRS also issued proposed regulations that provide sourcing rules for cloud transactions.
The Treasury and IRS have issued final regulations that provide rules for classifying digital and cloud transactions. The rules apply for purposes of the international provisions of the Code.
The rules retain the overall approach of the proposed regulations (NPRM REG-130700-14, August 14, 2019), with some revisions.
The Treasury and IRS also issued proposed regulations that provide sourcing rules for cloud transactions.
Background
Reg. §1.861-18 provides rules for classifying cross-border transactions involving digitized information, specifically computer programs, broadly grouped into the following categories:
- the transfer of a copyright;
- the transfer of a copyrighted article;
- the provision of services for the development or modification of a computer program; and
- the provision of know-how relating to the development of a computer program.
The 1998 final regulations focus on the distinction between the transfer of the copyright itself and transfer of a copyrighted article, using a substance-over-form characterization approach and by examining the underlying rights granted to the transferee. Transfers of copyrights and copyrighted articles are further characterized as complete or partial transfers, resulting in the transfers being characterized as either sales or licenses, in the case of a copyrights, or sales or leases, in the case of a copyrighted articles.
2025 Final Regulations
The 2025 final regulations maintain the basic framework for characterizing transfers of content and extend the characterization framework to digital content. Digital content is generally defined as any computer program or other content protected by copyright law, not just transactions involving computer programs.
The categories of transactions include:
- the transfer of a copyright in the digital content;
- the transfer of a copy of the digital content (a copyrighted article);
- the provision of services for the development or modification of the digital content; and
- the provision of know-how relating to the development of digital content.
The 2025 final regulations also provide for cloud transactions and characterize the transactions as a provision of services.
Cloud transactions are generally defined as transactions through which a person obtains on-demand network access to computer hardware, digital content, or similar resources.
The 2025 final regulations replace the de minimis rule and the concept of arrangement with a predominant character rule that applies to both digital content transactions and cloud transactions. Under the rule, a transaction with multiple elements is characterized based on the predominant character of the transaction.
Request for Comments on 2025 Final Regulations
The Treasury and IRS are considering whether the characterization rules should apply to all provisions of the Code and have requested comments on any specific areas that would be affected, with examples if appropriate. Comments are also requested on any guidance that would be needed and the approach the guidance should take. In addition to general comments, the Treasury and IRS also request comments on the desirability and effect of applying the rules in specific areas and the guidance need.
Comments should be submitted 90 days after the Notice requesting comments is published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, with consideration for comments submitted after that date that do not delay the guidance. Comments may be submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal www.regulations.com or or by mail to: Internal Revenue Service, CC:PA:01:PR (Notice 2025-6, Room 5203, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C., 20044.
Proposed Sourcing Rules for Cloud Transactions
Gross income from a cloud transaction is sourced as services. Under the Code, gross income from the performance of services is sourced to the place where the service is performed.
To determine the place of performance, the proposed regulations would take into account the location of the employees and assets, including both tangible and intangible assets, that contribute to the provision of cloud transactions. The sourcing rules would apply on a taxpayer-by-taxpayer basis.
The place of performance of a cloud transactions is established through a formula composed of a fraction that has three parts-the intangible property factor, the personnel factor, and the tangible property factor. The factors make up the denominator of the fraction. The numerator is the sum of each portion of each factor that is from sources within the United States. The gross income from a cloud transaction multiplied by the fraction is the U.S. source portion of the gross income.
T.D. 10022
Proposed Regulations, NPRM REG-107420-24
Notice 2025-6
The IRS has released final regulations implementing the clean hydrogen production credit under Code Sec. 45V, as well as the election to treat a clean hydrogen production facility as energy property for purposes of the energy investment credit under Code Sec. 48. The regulations generally apply to tax years beginning after December 26, 2023.
The IRS has released final regulations implementing the clean hydrogen production credit under Code Sec. 45V, as well as the election to treat a clean hydrogen production facility as energy property for purposes of the energy investment credit under Code Sec. 48. The regulations generally apply to tax years beginning after December 26, 2023.
The regulations adopt the proposed regulations (REG-117631-23) with certain modifications. Rules are provided for determining lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions rates resulting from hydrogen production processes; petitioning for provisional emissions rates; verifying production and sale or use of clean hydrogen; modifying or retrofitting existing qualified clean hydrogen production facilities; and using electricity from certain renewable or zero-emissions sources to produce qualified clean hydrogen.
Background
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169) added Code Sec. 45V to provide a tax credit to produce qualified clean hydrogen produced after 2022 at a qualified clean hydrogen production facility during the 10-year period beginning on the date the facility is originally placed in service.
The credit is calculated by multiplying an applicable amount by the kilograms of qualified clean hydrogen produced. The applicable amount ranges from $0.12 to $0.60 per kilogram depending on the level of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production of the hydrogen. The credit is multiplied by five if the qualified clean hydrogen production facility meets certain prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements.
Qualified Facility and Emissions Rate
The regulations provide that a qualified clean hydrogen production facility is a single production line that is used to produce qualified clean hydrogen. This includes all components, including multipurpose components, of property that function interdependently to produce qualified clean hydrogen through a process that results in the lifecycle GHG emissions rate used to determine the credit. It does not include equipment used to condition or transport hydrogen beyond the point of production, or feedstock-related equipment.
The lifecycle GHG emissions rate is determined under the latest publicly available 45VH2-GREET Model developed by the Argonne National Laboratory on the first day of the tax year during which the qualified clean hydrogen was produced. If a version of 45VH2-GREET becomes publicly available after the first day of the taxa year of production (but still within such tax year), then the taxpayer may elect to use the subsequent model.
Verifying Production and Sale
Code Sec. 45V requires the clean hydrogen to be produced for sale or use. No hydrogen is qualified clean hydrogen unless its production, sale, or use is verified by an unrelated party. A verification report prepared by a qualified verifier must be attached to a taxpayer’s Form 7210 for each qualified clean hydrogen production facility and for each tax year the Code Sec. 45V credit is claimed. The regulations outline the requirements for a verification report. They also contain requirements for the third-party verifier to perform to attest that the qualified clean hydrogen has been sold or used by a person for verifiable use.
Modified and Retrofitted Facilities
A facility placed in service before 2023 that is modified to produce qualified clean hydrogen may be eligible for the credit so long as the taxpayer’s expenses to modify the facility as chargeable to the capital account. However, merely changing fuel inputs does not constitute a modification for this purpose. A modification must enable to the facility to produce qualified clean hydrogen if it not before the modification to meet the lifecycle GHG emissions rate. Alternatively, an existing facility may be retrofitted to qualify for the credit provided that the fair market value of used property in the facility is not more than 20 percent of the facility’s total value (80/20 Rule).
Energy Credit Election
A taxpayer that owns and places in service a specified clean hydrogen production facility can make an irrevocable election to treat any qualified property that is part of the facility as energy property for purposes of the energy investment credit under Code Sec. 48. The final regulations contain definition of a specified facility, the energy percentage for the investment credit, and the time and manner for making the election. The rules include a safe harbor for determining the beginning of construction and using a provisional emissions rate (PER) to calculate the investment credit.
T.D. 10023
The IRS issued updates to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit (Code Sec. 25C) and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit (Code Sec. 25D). The former credit applies to qualifying property placed in service on or after January 1, 2023, and before January 1, 2033. The updates pertained to FS-2024-15. More information is available here.
The IRS issued updates to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit (Code Sec. 25C) and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit (Code Sec. 25D). The former credit applies to qualifying property placed in service on or after January 1, 2023, and before January 1, 2033. The updates pertained to FS-2024-15. More information is available here.
Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit
The credit is limited to $2,000 per taxpayer per taxable year in the aggregate for electric or natural gas heat pump water heaters, electric or natural gas heat pumps, and biomass stoves or boilers.
Thus, a taxpayer could claim a total credit of $3,200 if they had sufficient expenditures in property categories (or a home energy audit) subject to the $1,200 limitation and in property categories subject to the $2,000 limitation.
Additionally, a taxpayer can claim the credit only for qualifying expenditures incurred for an existing home, or for an addition to or renovation of an existing home, but not for a newly constructed home.
Residential Clean Energy Property Credit
One of the FAQs mentions that this credit is a nonrefundable personal tax credit. A taxpayer claiming a nonrefundable credit can only use it to decrease or eliminate tax liability.
The credit is generally limited to 30 percent of qualified expenditures made for property placed in service between 2022 and 2032. However, the credit allowed for qualified fuel cell property expenditures is 30 percent of the expenditures, up to a maximum credit of $500 for each half kilowatt of capacity of the qualified fuel cell property.
FS-2025-1
IR-2025-17
The IRS has provided updated guidance on the implementation of section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-600), as amended, regarding controversies involving whether individuals are "employees" for employment tax purposes. Section 530 (which is not an Internal Revenue Code section) provides relief for employers who are involved in worker classification status disputes with the IRS and face large employment tax assessments as a result of the IRS’s proposed reclassifications of workers.
The IRS has provided updated guidance on the implementation of section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-600), as amended, regarding controversies involving whether individuals are "employees" for employment tax purposes. Section 530 (which is not an Internal Revenue Code section) provides relief for employers who are involved in worker classification status disputes with the IRS and face large employment tax assessments as a result of the IRS’s proposed reclassifications of workers.
Section 530 Safe Harbor
Section 530 provides that an employer will not be liable for federal employment taxes regarding an individual or class of workers if certain statutory requirements are met. Section 530 relief applies only if the taxpayer did not treat the individual as an employee for federal employment tax purposes for the period at issue, and meets each of the following requirements for that period:
- the taxpayer filed all required federal tax returns, including information returns, on a basis that is consistent with the taxpayer’s treatment of the individual as not being an employee (reporting consistency requirement);
- the taxpayer did not treat the individual or any individual holding a substantially similar position as an employee (substantive consistency requirement); and
- the taxpayer had a reasonable basis for not treating the individual as an employee (reasonable basis requirement).
Rev. Proc. 85-18, 1985-1 CB 518, provided instructions for implementing section 530 relating to the employment tax status of independent contractors and employees.
Updated Guidance
The updated guidance clarifies provisions in Rev. Proc. 85-18 regarding the definition of employee, the section 530 requirement for the filing of required returns, and the reasonable basis safe harbor rules. The updated guidance also includes new provisions that reflect certain statutory changes made to section 530 since 1986.
Among other things, the updated guidance amplifies guidelines in Rev. Proc. 85-18 which interpreted the word “treat” for purposes of determining whether a taxpayer did not treat an individual as an employee for section 530 purposes. Under the updated guidance, with respect to any individual, actions that indicate “treatment” of the individual as an employee for section 530 purposes include:
- withholding of income tax or FICA taxes from any payments made;
- filing of an original or amended employment tax return;
- filing or issuance of a Form W-2; and
- contracting with a third party to perform acts required of employers.
Provisions in Rev. Proc. 85-18 that explained how refunds, credits, abatements, and handling of claims applied to taxpayers who were under audit or otherwise involved in administrative or judicial processes with the IRS at the time of enactment of section 530 are no longer applicable and were not included in the updated guidance. Section 530 relief remains available at any stage in the administrative or judicial process if the requirements for relief are met.
Effect on Other Documents
Rev. Proc. 85-18, 1985-1 CB 518, is modified and superseded.
Rev. Proc. 2025-10
The IRS has issued final regulation identifying certain partnership related-party basis adjustment transactions as transactions of interest (TOI), a type of reportable transaction under Reg. §1.6011-4. Taxpayers that participate and material advisors to these transactions, and substantially similar transactions, are required to disclose as much to the IRS using Form 8886 and Form 8918, respectively, or be subject to penalties.
The IRS has issued final regulation identifying certain partnership related-party basis adjustment transactions as transactions of interest (TOI), a type of reportable transaction under Reg. §1.6011-4. Taxpayers that participate and material advisors to these transactions, and substantially similar transactions, are required to disclose as much to the IRS using Form 8886 and Form 8918, respectively, or be subject to penalties.
Basis Adjustment Transactions
A transaction is covered by the regulations if a partnership with two or more related partners engages in any of the following transactions.
- The partnership makes a current or liquidating distribution of property to a partner who is related to one or more partners, and the partnership increases the basis of one or more of its remaining properties under Code Sec. 734(b) and (c) by more than $10 million ($25 million for tax years before 2025).
- The partnership distributes property to a partner related to one or more partners in liquidation of the partnership interest, and the basis of one or more distributed properties is increased under Code Sec. 732(b) and (c) by more than $10 million ($25 million for tax years before 2025).
- The partnership distributes property to a partner who is related to one or more partners, the basis of one or more distributed properties is increased under Code Sec. 732(d) by more than $10 million ($25 million for tax years before 2025), and the related partner acquired all or a part of its interest in the partnership in a transaction that would have been a basis adjustment transaction had a Code Sec. 754 election been in effect.
A basis adjustment transaction for this purpose would occur if a partner transferred an interest in the partnership to a related partner in a nonrecognition transaction, and the basis of one or more partnership properties is increased under Code Sec. 743(b)(1) and (c) by more than $10 million ($25 million for tax years before 2025).
Retroactive Reporting
The final regulations limit the disclosure rule for open tax years that fall withing a six-year lookback window. The window is the seventy-two-month period before the first month of a taxpayer’s most recent tax year that began before January 14, 2025. The basis increase threshold in a TOI during the six-year lookback period is $25 million.
A taxpayer has until July 13, 2025, to file disclosure statements for TOIs in open tax years for which a tax return has already been filed and that fall within the six-year lookback window. Material advisors have until April 14, 2025, to file their disclosure statements for tax statements made before the final regulations.
T.D. 10028
IR-2025-6
Regulations under Code Sec. 2801, which imposes a tax on covered gifts and covered bequests received by a citizen or resident of the United States from a covered expatriate, have been issued.
Regulations under Code Sec. 2801, which imposes a tax on covered gifts and covered bequests received by a citizen or resident of the United States from a covered expatriate, have been issued.
Definitions
Reg. §28.2801-1 provides the general rules of liability imposed by Code Sec. 2801. For purposes of Code Sec. 2801, domestic trusts and foreign trusts electing to be treated as domestic trusts are treated as U.S. citizens. Terms used in chapter 15 of the Code are defined in Reg. §28.2801-2. The definition of the term “resident” is the transfer tax definition, which reduces opportunities to avoid the expatriate tax and is consistent with the purpose of the statute. The definition of “covered bequest” identifies three categories of property that are included in the definition and subject to tax under Code Sec. 2801. Reg. §§28.2801-2(i)(2) and (5) modify the definitions of an indirect acquisition of property.
Exceptions to the definitions of covered gifts and bequests are detailed in Reg. §28.2801-3. The timely payment of the tax shown on the covered expatriate’s gift or estate tax return was eliminated from the regulations as it relates to the exception from the definitions of covered gift and covered bequest. A rule was added in Reg. §28.2801-3(c)(3) that would limit the value of a covered bequest to the amount that exceeds the value of a covered gift to which tax under Code Sec. 2801 was previously imposed.
Covered Gifts and Bequests Made in Trust
Reg. §28.2801-3(d) provides rules regarding covered gifts and covered bequests made in trust, including transfers of property in trust that are subject to a general power of appointment granted by the covered expatriate. Contrary to the gift tax rule treating the trust beneficiary or holder of an immediate right to withdraw as the recipient of property, the rules treat transfers in trust that are covered gifts or bequests as transfers to the trust, which are taxed under Code Sec. 2801(e)(4). Consistent with the estate and gift tax rules, the exercise, release, or lapse of a covered expatriate’s general power of appointment for the benefit of a U.S. citizen or resident is a covered gift or covered bequest. Only for purposes of Code Sec. 2801, a covered expatriate’s grant of a general power of appointment over property not held in trust is a covered gift or bequest to the powerholder as soon as both the power is exercisable and the transfer of the property subject to the power is irrevocable.
Liability for Payment and Computation of Tax
Reg. §28.2801-4 provides rules regarding who is liable for the payment of the tax. In general, the U.S. citizen or resident, including a domestic trust, who receives the covered gift or bequest is liable for paying the tax. A non-electing foreign trust is not a U.S. citizen and is not liable for the tax. The U.S. citizen or resident who receives distributions from a non-electing foreign trust is liable on the receipt of the distribution to the extent the distribution is attributable to a covered gift or bequest. Rules regarding the date on which a recipient receives covered gifts or bequests are explained in Reg. §28.2801-4(d)(8)(ii). Reg. §28.2801-4(a)(2)(iii) is reserved to address charitable remainder and charitable lead trusts.
The manner in which the tax is computed is set forth in Reg. §28.2801-4(e). The value of the covered gift or bequest is the fair market value of the property on the date of its receipt, which is explained in Reg. §28.2801-4(d). A refund is allowed under Code Sec. 6511 if foreign gift or estate tax is paid after payment of the Code Sec. 2801 tax. In that scenario, the U.S recipient should file a claim for refund or a protective claim for refund on or before the application period of limitations has expired.
Foreign Trusts
Reg. §28.2801-5 sets forth rules applicable to foreign trusts, including the computation of the amount of a distribution from a foreign trust that is attributable to a covered gift or bequest made to the foreign trust. The election by a foreign trust to be treated as a domestic trust is explained in Reg. §28.2801-5(d)(3).
Other Rules
Reg. §28.2801-6 addresses special rules, including the determination of basis and the applicability of the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax to certain Code Sec. 2801 transfers. Reg. §28.2801-6(d) discusses applicable penalties. Reg. §28.2801-7 provides guidance on the responsibility of a U.S. recipient to determine if tax under Code Sec. 2801 is due. Administrative regulations that address filing and payment due dates, returns, extension requests, and recordkeeping requirements with respect to the Code Sec. 2801 tax are also provided.
Due Date of Form 708
Form 708, United States Return of Tax for Gifts and Bequests from Covered Expatriates, is generally due on or before the 15th day of the 18th calendar month following the close of the calendar year in which the covered gift or bequest was received. The due date for Form 708 is further explained in Reg. 28.6071-1. Form 708 has yet to be issued by the IRS.
The regulations are generally effective on January 14, 2025.
T.D. 10027
The IRS has issued a revenue ruling addressing the federal tax treatment of contributions and benefits under state-administered paid family and medical leave (PFML) programs. The ruling clarifies how these contributions and benefits are classified for income tax, employment tax, and reporting purposes, with distinctions drawn between employer and employee contributions.
The IRS has issued a revenue ruling addressing the federal tax treatment of contributions and benefits under state-administered paid family and medical leave (PFML) programs. The ruling clarifies how these contributions and benefits are classified for income tax, employment tax, and reporting purposes, with distinctions drawn between employer and employee contributions.
PFML Contributions
Mandatory contributions made by employers under PFML programs are classified as excise taxes deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses under Code Sec. 164. These payments are deemed state-imposed obligations for the purpose of funding public programs and are not included in employees' gross income under Code Sec. 61. In contrast, mandatory contributions withheld from employees’ wages are treated as state income taxes under Code Sec. 164(a)(3). Employees may deduct these amounts on their federal tax returns if they itemize deductions, subject to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap under Code Sec. 164(b)(6).
The ruling further specifies the treatment of benefits paid under PFML programs. Family leave benefits, which provide wage replacement during caregiving periods, are included in the recipient’s gross income under Code Sec. 61 but are not considered wages for federal employment tax purposes under Code Sec. 3121. By comparison, medical leave benefits attributable to employee contributions are excluded from gross income under Code Sec. 104(a)(3). However, medical leave benefits attributable to employer contributions are partially taxable under Code Sec. 105 and are subject to FICA taxes.
The ruling also addresses scenarios where employers voluntarily cover portions of employees’ contributions, referred to as "employer pick-ups." Such pick-ups are treated as additional compensation, included in employees’ gross income under Code Sec. 61, and are subject to federal employment taxes. Employers, however, may deduct these payments as ordinary business expenses under Code Sec. 162.
To ensure compliance, the IRS requires states and employers to report benefits exceeding $600 annually under Code Sec. 6041 using Form 1099. Additionally, benefits subject to employment taxes must be reported on Form W-2.
The ruling modifies prior guidance and includes a transition period for 2025 to allow states and employers to adjust their systems to meet reporting and compliance requirements. This clarification provides a framework for managing the tax implications of PFML programs, ensuring consistent treatment across jurisdictions.
Effective Date
This revenue ruling is effective for payments made on or after January 1, 2025. However, transition relief is provided to the states, the District of Columbia, and employers from certain withholding, payment, and information reporting requirements for state-paid medical leave benefits paid made during calendar year 2025.
Effect on Other Guidance
Rev. Rul. 81-194, Rev. Rul. 81-193, Rev. Rul. 81-192, and Rev. Rul. 81-191 are amplified to include the holdings in this revenue ruling that are applicable to the facts in those rulings. Rev. Rul. 72-191, as modified by Rev. Rul. 81-192, is further modified.
Rev. Rul. 2025-4
IR-2025-16
National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins identified the lengthy processing and uncertainty regarding the employee retention credit as being among the ten most serious problems facing taxpayers.
National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins identified the lengthy processing and uncertainty regarding the employee retention credit as being among the ten most serious problems facing taxpayers.
"Although the [Internal Revenue Service] has processed several hundred thousand claims in recent months, it was still sitting on a backlog of about 1.2 million claims as of October 26, 2024," Collins noted in her just released 2024 Annual Report to Congress. "Many claims have been pending for more than a year, and with the imminent start of the 2025 filing season, the IRS will shift its focus and resources to administering the filing season, resulting in even longer ERC processing delays."
Collins is calling on the IRS to provide more specific information with claims denials, more transparency on the timing of claims processing, and allowing taxpayers to submit documentation and seek an appeal before disallowing a claim that was not subject to an audit.
In addition to ERC processing, Collins identified delays in processing of tax returns as another serious problem taxpayers are facing, including delays associated with the more than 10 million paper 1040 returns and more than 75 million paper-filed returns and forms overall each year, as well as issues surrounding rejections of e-filed returns, most of which are valid returns. These delays end up delaying refunds and can be particularly hard on low-income filers who are receiving the Earned Income Tax Credit.
"We recommend the IRS continue to prioritize automating its tax processing systems, including by scanning all paper-filed tax returns in time for the 2026 filing season and processing amended tax returns automatically," the report states.
Another processing issue identified in the report deals with delays in processing and refunds for victims of identity theft.
Collins reported that the delays in addressing identity theft issues grew to 22 months in fiscal year 2024, affecting nearly 500,000 taxpayers.
"The IRS has advised us that it has begun to prioritize resolution of cases involving refunds over balance-due returns rather than following its traditional ‘first in, first out’ approach," the report states. "This is somewhat good news, but I strongly encourage the IRS to fix this problem once and for all during the coming year."
Other issues in the top 10 include:
- Taxpayer service is often not timely or adequate;
- The prevalence of tax-related scams;
- Employment recruitment, hiring, training, and retention challenges are hindering transformational change within the industry;
- The dependence on paper forms and manual document review in processing Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers is causing delays and potential security risks;
- Limited taxpayer financial and tax literacy;
- The IRS’s administration of civil tax penalties is often unfair, inconsistently deters improper behavior, fails to promote efficient administration, and thus discourages tax compliance; and
- Changes to the IRS’s criminal voluntary disclosure practice requirements may be reducing voluntary compliance and negatively impacting the tax gap.
Collins also called on Congress to ensure the IRS receives adequate funding specifically for taxpayer services and technology upgrades, noting that many improvements that are highlighted in the report were made possible by the Inflation Reduction Act, which provided supplemental funding to the agency.
"Much of the funding has generated controversy – namely, the funding allocated for enforcement," the report notes. "But some of the funding has received strong bipartisan support – namely, the funding allocated for taxpayer services and technology modernization."
She reported that telephone service has improved dramatically, correspondence processing has improved dramatically, and in-person has become more accessible following the IRA funding, as well as technology improvements including increased scanning and processing of paper-filed tax returns electronically; increases in electronic correspondence; expansion of secure messaging; the ability to submit forms from mobile phones; and increases in both chatbot and voicebot technology.
"I want to highlight this distinction so that if Congress decides to cut IRA funding, it does not inadvertently throw the baby out with the bathwater," she reports.
By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor
IR-2025-4
The Affordable Care Act—enacted nearly five years ago—phased in many new requirements affecting individuals and employers. One of the most far-reaching requirements, the individual mandate, took effect this year and will be reported on 2014 income tax returns filed in 2015. The IRS is bracing for an avalanche of questions about taxpayer reporting on 2014 returns and, if liable, any shared responsibility payment. For many taxpayers, the best approach is to be familiar with the basics before beginning to prepare and file their returns.
The Affordable Care Act—enacted nearly five years ago—phased in many new requirements affecting individuals and employers. One of the most far-reaching requirements, the individual mandate, took effect this year and will be reported on 2014 income tax returns filed in 2015. The IRS is bracing for an avalanche of questions about taxpayer reporting on 2014 returns and, if liable, any shared responsibility payment. For many taxpayers, the best approach is to be familiar with the basics before beginning to prepare and file their returns.
Individual mandate
Beginning January 1, 2014, the Affordable Care Act requires individuals (and their dependents) to have minimum essential health care coverage or make a shared responsibility payment, unless exempt. This is commonly called the "individual mandate."
Employer reporting
Nearly all employer-provided health coverage is treated as minimum essential coverage. This includes self-insured plans, COBRA coverage, and retiree coverage. Large employers will provide employees with new Form 1095-C, Employer-Provided Health Insurance Coverage and Offer, which will report the type of coverage provided. The IRS has encouraged employers to voluntarily report starting in 2015 for the 2014 plan year. Mandatory reporting begins in 2016 for the 2015 plan year.
Marketplace coverage
Coverage obtained through the Affordable Care Act Marketplace is also treated as minimum essential coverage. Marketplace enrollees should expect to receive new Form 1095-A, Health Insurance Marketplace Statement, from the Marketplace. Individuals with Marketplace coverage will indicate on their returns that they have minimum essential coverage. Because so many individuals with Marketplace coverage also qualify for a special tax credit, they will also likely need to complete new Form 8962, Premium Tax Credit (discussed below).
Medicare, Medicaid and other government coverage
Medicare, TRICARE, CHIP, Medicaid, and other government health programs are treated as minimum essential coverage. There are some very narrow exceptions but overall, most government-sponsored coverage is minimum essential coverage.
Exemptions
Some individuals are expressly exempt under the Affordable Care Act from making a shared responsibility payment. There are multiple categories of exemptions. They include:
- Short coverage gap
- Religious conscience
- Federally-recognized Native American nation
- Income below income tax return filing requirement
The short coverage gap applies to individuals who lacked minimum essential coverage for less than three consecutive months during 2014. They will not be responsible for making a shared responsibility payment. Individuals who are members of a religious organization recognized as conscientiously opposed to accepting insurance benefits also are exempt from the individual mandate. Similarly, members of a federally-recognized Native American nation are exempt. If a taxpayer’s income is below the minimum threshold for filing a return, he or she is exempt from making a shared responsibility payment.
The IRS has developed new Form 8965, Health Coverage Exemptions. Taxpayers exempt from the individual mandate will file Form 8965 with their federal income tax return.
Shared responsibility payment
All other individuals - individuals without minimum essential coverage and who are not exempt - must make a shared responsibility payment when they file their 2014 return. For 2014, the payment amount is the greater of: One percent of the person’s household income that is above the tax return threshold for their filing status; or a flat dollar amount, which is $95 per adult and $47.50 per child, limited to a maximum of $285. The individual shared responsibility payment is capped at the cost of the national average premium for the bronze level health plan available through the Marketplace in 2014. Taxpayers will report the amount of their individual shared responsibility payment on their 2014 Form 1040.
The IRS has cautioned that it will offset a taxpayer’s refund if he or she fails to make a shared responsibility payment if required. However, the Affordable Care Act prevents the IRS from using its lien and levy authority to collect an unpaid shared responsibility payment.
Code Sec. 36B credit
Only individuals who obtain coverage through the Marketplace are eligible for the Code Sec. 36B premium assistance tax credit. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has reported that more than two-thirds of Marketplace enrollees are eligible for the credit and many enrollees have received advance payment of the credit.
All advance payments of the credit must be reconciled on new Form 8962, which will be filed with the taxpayer’s income tax return. Taxpayers will calculate the actual credit they qualified for based on their actual 2014 income. If the actual premium tax credit is larger than the sum of advance payments made during the year, the individual will be entitled to an additional credit amount. If the actual credit is smaller than the sum of the advance payments, the individual’s refund will be reduced or the amount of tax owed will be increased, subject to a sliding scale of income-based repayment caps.
A change in circumstance, such as marriage or the birth/adoption of a child, could increase or decrease the amount of the credit. Individuals who are receiving an advance payment of the credit should notify the Marketplace of any life changes so the amount of the advance payment can be adjusted if necessary. Please contact our office if you have any questions about the Code Sec. 36B credit.
IRS officials have told Congress that the agency is ready for the new filings and reporting requirements. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
The answer is no for 2010, but yes, in practical terms, for 2014 and beyond. The health care reform package (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) does not require individuals to carry health insurance in 2010. However, after 2013, individuals without minimum essential health insurance coverage will be liable for a penalty unless otherwise exempt.
The answer is no for 2010, but yes, in practical terms, for 2014 and beyond. The health care reform package (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) does not require individuals to carry health insurance in 2010. However, after 2013, individuals without minimum essential health insurance coverage will be liable for a penalty unless otherwise exempt.
Shared responsibility
The health care reform package describes health insurance coverage as "shared responsibility." Individuals, employers, the federal government, and the states all have roles to play in guaranteeing that individuals do not lack minimum essential health insurance coverage.
The health care reform package assumes that employer-provided health insurance will continue to be the primary means of delivering coverage after 2013. The health care reform package includes measures that lawmakers hope will keep premium costs down along with tax incentives, so employers continue to offer health insurance. For larger employers (those with 50 or more employees), that "encouragement" is also combined with penalties if alternate health insurance is not offered.
Millions of Americans are also currently covered by Medicaid, Medicare and other government programs. They will continue to be covered by these programs after 2013. Indeed, some of these government programs will be expanded between now and 2013, covering more individuals.
Individual responsibility
Beginning in 2014, the health care reform package imposes a penalty on individuals for each month they fail to have minimum essential health insurance coverage for themselves and their dependents. Another name for the penalty is "shared responsibility payment."
As a baseline, all individuals without minimum essential health insurance coverage will be liable for the penalty. However, the health care reform package expressly excludes certain individuals from liability for the penalty. They include:
- Individuals whose household income is below their income thresholds for filing a federal income tax return;
- Individuals who are exempt on religious conscience grounds;
- Individuals whose contribution to employer-provided coverage exceeds a threshold percentage;
- Hardship cases;
- Native Americans;
- Undocumented aliens;
- Incarcerated individuals;
- Individuals with short lapses of minimum essential coverage;
- Individuals covered by Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs; and
- Certain individuals outside the U.S.
Amount of penalty
The monthly penalty after 2013 is 1/12 of the flat dollar amount or a percentage of income, whichever is greater. For 2014, the flat dollar amount is $95 and the percentage of income is one percent. The flat dollar amount rises to $695 in 2016 (indexed for inflation thereafter) and the percentage of income increases to 2.5 percent.
For individuals under age 18, the flat dollar amount is 50 percent of the amount for adults. Generally, a family's total penalty cannot exceed $285 for 2014 (rising to $2,085 by 2016) or the national average annual premium for the "bronze" level of coverage through a state insurance exchange. By 2014, each state must establish an insurance exchange where individuals can shop for health insurance coverage. The exchanges will have four levels of coverage: bronze, silver, gold, and platinum.
Example. Ana, age 38, is self-employed with a modified adjusted gross income (AGI) of $68,500 for 2014. Ana does not have minimum essential coverage for all 12 months of 2014 and is not exempt from carrying minimum essential coverage because of income or other qualifying reasons. Ana will be liable for a penalty of the greater of $95 or one percent of her modified AGI.
Example. Ana's mother, Barbara, is enrolled in Medicare. Barbara has minimum essential coverage because she is enrolled in Medicare and is not liable for a penalty.
Health insurance tax credits
At the same time the individual responsibility requirement kicks in, the health care reform package provides a refundable health insurance premium assistance tax credit to qualified persons. The premium assistance credit will operate on a sliding scale based on an individual's relationship to the federal poverty level (between 100 and 400 percent).
The healthcare reform package makes the premium assistance tax credit refundable and also provides for advance payment of the credit. Advance payment will be made to the health plan in which the individual is enrolled.
Adult children
There is one important change regarding individual coverage for 2010. Effective September 23, 2010, the health care reform package enables more young adults to remain on their parents' health insurance policies. Generally, employer-sponsored group health plans will be required to provide coverage for adult children up to age 26 if the adult child is ineligible to enroll in another employer-sponsored plan. The health care reform package also extends the employer-provided health coverage gross income exclusion to coverage for adult children under age 27 as of the end of the tax year.
Guidance
The IRS, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies are expected to issue extensive guidance on the individual responsibility mandate. Our office will keep you posted on developments.